Navigation
Public engagement

Becoming a Scientist

Read online for free

Print your own copy

Virus Fighter

Build a virus or fight a pandemic!

Play online

Maya's Marvellous Medicine

Read online for free

Print your own copy

Battle Robots of the Blood

Read online for free

Print your own copy

Just for Kids! All about Coronavirus

Read online for free

Print your own copy

Archive
LabListon on Twitter
Monday
Oct062025

Nobel Prize for regulatory T cells

A small primer on the Nobel Prize awarded to Mary E. Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell and Shimon Sakaguchi today. This prize was for combining two separate fields of immunology research - genetic research on IPEX and immunology research of regulatory T cells (Tregs), with enormous impact on biology/medicine.

First, let's talk about IPEX. It is short for "Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome", which is a bit of a mouth-full. Essentially, it is a severe autoimmune disease, impacting boys (inherited only from the mother), which is fatal in early childhood unless treated. By coincidence, there was a mouse strain with the same disease and inheritance pattern called “Scurfy”, allowing it to be studied in mice.

IPEX/Scurfy was rather mysterious, but because of the inheritance pattern it was quickly mapped to the X chromosome. Several teams of scientists worked on mapping this disorder down to the gene level, with Brunkow and Ramsdell leading the teams that identified FOXP3 as the causative gene in both humans and mice, with major papers in 2001.

Completely independent of this, we had the field of regulatory T cells. There were some misleading experiments on "suppressive T cells" early on, a field which rapidly built and then collapsed in the 80s. Few of those experiments had lasting impact in the field of immunology, but an exception were the papers of Nicole Le Douarin in 1987/1988. She grafted the wing buds of quail onto embryonic chickens, which developed into chickens with quail wings, which were then rapidly rejected by the immune system. The key finding, however, was that if the proto-thymus was also transplanted the chickens kept their wings long term. Here it was quite important that the chicken was used, as it has 10-16 anatomically-separated thymic lobes and you only need to transplant one to get transplant acceptance. This means that the chicken developed a form of tolerance mediated by T cells educated in the thymus but effective in the periphery.

It was a hard and unpopular field for decades, however, with the key pioneers being Fiona Powrie and Shimon Sakaguchi. They chased up independent sets of T cells with immunosuppressive properties, using different markers on what were ultimately the same cells – regulatory T cells, potent at shutting down immune responses in multiple different assays.

It wasn’t until 2003 that regulatory T cells gained wide uptake by the immunology community. This key breakthrough happened by the linking of FOXP3, the IPEX/Scurfy gene, and regulatory T cells. Three groups, lead by Sakaguchi, Ramsdell and Sasha Rudensky, all demonstrated that FOXP3 was acting as the master transcription factor that converted regular T cells into the immunosuppressive regulatory T cells. Suddenly everyone could study Tregs and manipulate their genetics, with tool after tool coming online (such as Foxp3GFP, Foxp3Cre, Foxp3DTR – Rudensky, Tim Spawasser and Jeff Bluestone, among others). It triggered an exponential increase in papers on regulatory T cells, linking them to disease after disease.

The impact has been enormous, with regulatory T cells going from being a niche frowned-upon subset of immunology, to underpinning our entire understanding of how the immune system works. This is obvious important for diseases where we want to shut down the immune system, such as autoimmunity, allergy, transplantation and inflammatory diseases. There anything to boost the number or function of regulatory T cells could be clinically beneficial, with the therapeutic interleukin 2 (IL2) being the prototype therapy and still in clinical use today. It was also a key discovery for contexts where we want to activate the immune system, in particular in cancers, which locally recruit regulatory T cells to protect themselves from immune clearance. Treatments such as anti-CTLA4 essentially allow inflammatory T cells to bypass suppression by regulatory T cells, and have transformed the oncology space. The pre-clinical pipeline is even richer, so we can expect many more regulatory T cell-based therapies to enter the market soon!

Huge congratulations not only to the team leaders who won this prize, but all the students, technicians and expert scientists who did the work that underpins this discovery. Their work, and the work of those following in their footsteps, is changing the future for patients!

 

Also see a few articles where I was quoted in the Guardian and Science.

Thursday
Sep252025

Optimisation of blocking during flow cytometry

Another new flow cytometery guide drop from Oliver Burton, just published in Current Protocols.

This one is on optimising blocking while preserving signal, in particular how to overcome Fc interactions and dye-dye interactions, and preventing tandem break-down.

The details are in the protocol, with variants for intracellluar and cytokine staining, but generally-speaking normal mouse/rat serum, BioLegend Tandem stabilizer and Thermo/BD Brilliant Stain Buffer is an optimal combo. True-Stain and other additions aren't worth the extra $$$.

For Tandem Signal Enhancers, you don't really need them for mouse cells, and for human cells a cheaper alternative is simply to fix your cells and stain with tandems after fixation. Both eliminates non-specific tandem binding and also reduces tandem break-down. Since monocyte blocks reduce transcription factor detection, for some reason, leave them out if you are doing intracellular staining.

 

The Brilliant and Super Bright dyes really do need the Brilliant Stain buffers, but be aware that these buffers are mildly fluorescent, so leave them out if you don't need the dye, and titrate them down when you use them. 1/2 to 1/4 is normally good, and for many antibodies even lower is fine (and cheaper!).

For the tandem dyes, Tandem Stabilizer is good, but you can make it easier through panel design. Tandem breakdown is not purely chemical - it is higher on monocytes than lymphocytes, and is largely abolished in fixed cells. So move those tandem dyes to post-fix T cells if you can!

 

We've tried to cover all the main use cases, so take a look at Oliver's trouble-shooting guide to reduce off-target binding and preserve signal.

Friday
Sep192025

A near-universal ultra-cheap fix/perm protocol for flow cytometry

For our flow cytometry peeps, would you like to have a single fix/perm protocol that is optimised for everything? One that preserves fluorophores while allowing simultaneous TF and cytokine staining? How about a protocol that is 100-fold cheaper than your current one?

Over the last 8 years, Oliver Burton has tested >1000 different fix/perm combos, and here the final verdict is: "Burton's Best Buffer": 2% formalin, 0.05% Fairy dish soap, 0.5% Tween-20, 0.1% Triton X-100.

Yep, replace all of those expensive detergents with Fairy dishwashing liquid. It is as good as the BD Foxp3 fix/perm kit for transcription factors, as good as eBio perm for cytokines, preserves even weak endogenous GFP killed by most fix/perm combos, and preserves dye integrity too. Burton's Best Buffer is simply the best fix/perm protocol to use under any condition (except phospho-flow).

Plus it is dirt cheap - one bottle of Fairy (or Dreft, Dawn, Yes, JAR, or whatever they sell it as locally) will literally last your lab for decades.

Take a read of the protocol here.

Wednesday
Aug202025

ImmunoTea interview

I'm interviewed in the latest episode of ImmunoTea. Take a listen for all things Tregs and neuroimmunology!
Thursday
Aug072025

Our lab in numbers

We've just had our 200th person join the lab! Welcome to Ida Jobe! I could write books about them as individuals (and have!), but here are our lab members in statistics:

  • 38% domestic, 62% international from 54 countries
  • 66% women, 33% men, 1% non-binary
  • 78% from under-represented groups

Friday
Aug012025

Congratulations to Dr Katy Palios!

Congratulations to Dr Katy Palios for winning the 2025 Golden Pipette! Katy won the Golden Pipette for her exceptional scientific leadership and teamwork, bringing out the best in all those around her. Well done Dr Palios!

Friday
Aug012025

New lab photo

Wednesday
Jul302025

Graduation week for Dr Dashwood, Dr Gentry and Dr Ali!

Huge congratulations to Dr Amy Dashwood, Dr Ntombizodwa Gentry and Dr Magda Ali! All three graduating this week with their PhDs from University of Cambridge! Our first Cambridge PhD students, who I find out from reading the acknowledgements were known as "Adrian's Angels" or "The Three Musketeers". Fantastic scientists all, I'm really proud to have been part of their career journey. I look forward to following their successes into the future, already started with a postdoc at the University of Manchester, a postdoc at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB), and a commercialisation position at Cambridge Enterprise. Well done!

Wednesday
Jul092025

Understanding tissue migration

We have an exciting new bioRxiv story that just went live! This one takes a computational immunology approach to understanding tissue-resident lymphocytes. The story highlights the extra value mathematical modelling can bring to biology.

It starts with a large multi-tissue multi-timepoint parabiosis experiment we ran to understand tissue Tregs. Václav Gergelits, lead author on the study, saw greater potential in this dataset to understand the kinetics of lymphocyte migration broadly.

We extracted turnover data for CD4, CD8, Treg, B cells and NK cells from 17 tissue sources, and generated a sophisticated model of migration, activation and death for each lineage and tissue. The Markov chain modelling found high-confidence solutions that matched the empirical data beautifully.

This tells us a probabilistic model and three distinct states (resting/activated/resident) are sufficient to recapitulate the complex migratory and tissue-residency behaviour of these cells. The cell states change probabilities, but the behaviour is still *probabilistic*.

This means lymphocytes do not have a residency "clock". We can measure the average dwell times for resident cells, but if this average residency time is 3 weeks, it does not mean cells have a 3-week timer. It means the cells have a daily probability of leaving that gives a 3 week average. The dice roll comes up earlier for some cells than for others, within those cells being intrinsically different. Like radioactive decay of atoms, it is just probability - there is nothing intrinsically different about the uranium atoms that decay after a week vs those that decay after a million years, they just had different rolls of the dice.

This approach can explain much of the variation in cell fate without needing to invoke cellular heterogeneity! Two identical cells can have highly divergent outcomes simply because of probability, without different underlying biology. In fact, we can create thousands of identical "digital cells", model them with these simple rules, and we get the empirically-observed range of dwell-times. There is no need to invoke TCR clonality or the like - it is simply an emergent property of cells with probabilistic kinetics!



A great example of applied mathematics informing biology!

Take a read of the pre-print here.

Wednesday
Jul022025

Understanding vaccination in transplant patients

We have a new systems vaccinology paper out at npj Vaccines!

The study tackles the problematic question of why transplant patients responded so poorly to the COVID vaccine. While most people had great antibodies from a single dose, only half of transplant patients have responded even after three!

We took blood from 20 healthy, 31 lung transplant and 59 kidney transplant patients prior to vaccination, and profiled 444 immunological parameters, to get a comprehensive systems immunology profile. We then followed who did and didn't respond to the vaccine, to find the immunological associates.

First up, there are clinical effects: Vaccine response was especially poor soon after transplantation, and in patients on immunosuppressive cocktails, especially those including MMF. Even taking this into account, there were immunological drivers associated with poor response.

As you might predict, the patients that responded best were those with an immune profile that had returned closer to normal post-transplantation. In fact, you could predict vaccine response with 93% accuracy just based on 10 immune parameters.

 

Oddly though, some patients were able to hobble together a poor but detectable response after two shots. These patients didn't have a more normal immune profile, and had quite unusual relationships between immune populations, suggesting that they had put together a poor-but-functional "kludge".



This study was a joint initiative from our lab, Arnaud Marchant's lab at at ULB and Stephanie Humblet-Baron's lab at KU Leuven. 

Huge thanks to all team members, especially Nicolas Gemander, Julika Neumann, Rafael Veiga and Isabelle Etienne for their leadership roles.

Biggest thanks of all to the patients who volunteered for the study!

 

Read the full paper here